Complexity assessment at a
A leading recreational vehicle company with a history of innovation and product diversity was facing a 5th straight year of stagnant profitability. Concerned that the same innovation which was once the driver behind growth may now be the culprit behind the decline, company leadership turned to WP&C. Together with WP&C, the company was able to understand the impact of complexity on profitability and develop a plan to simplify and improve profitability while fostering their spirit of innovation.
With a history of innovation and impeccable design, the company had become a market leader in each of its product lines. As the company grew—now serving more than 100 countries—so too did the number of products, most of which were refreshed annually. The company’s swelling SKU count and the cost of what it saw as 'necessary' variety was limiting profitable growth with EBITDA stagnant the past several years. It was the classic 'Expanding Portfolio' siren that had led the business to deliver everything the customer asked for at the expense of profitability.
The company’s leadership recognized that in order to reverse the recent trend of declining profitability and to remain competitive it needed to clearly understand where profit was being created as well as where it was being destroyed. Plagued by product proliferation, the company was cannibalizing its own sales and quickly becoming overwhelmed by its own complexity. WP&C was called upon to not only shed light on the underlying drivers of complexity within the portfolio but to build an actionable approach to SKU rationalization.
Reassess the size of the portfolio: Cross-referencing competitor portfolio variety against that of their own and ensuring portfolio alignment with the overall company’s strategy allows for greater scale and recapturing value with reduced cannibalization while still meeting customer needs.
Add variety only where it matters most: As mid-tier products were profit destructive, having the greatest variety in this line-up was not valued by the customer. Limiting variety in mid-tier allows for greater variety to be redeployed where it would be valued.
Focus where complexity adds more value than it destroys: Systems upgrades add much less complexity than product refreshes while providing greater perceived value to customers and freeing up innovation resources for potentially greater opportunities.
Manage parts complexity: Parts introduce significant complexity and cumulatively can add more than whole new products. Reducing the number of unique part SKUs where commonality already exists saves on both inventory and R&D.
With a history of innovation and impeccable design, the company had become a market leader in each of its product lines. As the company grew—now serving more than 100 countries—so too did the number of products, most of which were refreshed annually. The company’s swelling SKU count and the cost of what it saw as 'necessary' variety was limiting profitable growth with EBITDA stagnant the past several years. It was the classic 'Expanding Portfolio' siren that had led the business to deliver everything the customer asked for at the expense of profitability.
The company’s leadership recognized that in order to reverse the recent trend of declining profitability and to remain competitive it needed to clearly understand where profit was being created as well as where it was being destroyed. Plagued by product proliferation, the company was cannibalizing its own sales and quickly becoming overwhelmed by its own complexity. WP&C was called upon to not only shed light on the underlying drivers of complexity within the portfolio but to build an actionable approach to SKU rationalization.
Reassess the size of the portfolio: Cross-referencing competitor portfolio variety against that of their own and ensuring portfolio alignment with the overall company’s strategy allows for greater scale and recapturing value with reduced cannibalization while still meeting customer needs.
Add variety only where it matters most: As mid-tier products were profit destructive, having the greatest variety in this line-up was not valued by the customer. Limiting variety in mid-tier allows for greater variety to be redeployed where it would be valued.
Focus where complexity adds more value than it destroys: Systems upgrades add much less complexity than product refreshes while providing greater perceived value to customers and freeing up innovation resources for potentially greater opportunities.
Manage parts complexity: Parts introduce significant complexity and cumulatively can add more than whole new products. Reducing the number of unique part SKUs where commonality already exists saves on both inventory and R&D.